Android tonegenerator uses1/13/2024 ![]() What has been discussed with people like PeterZ, PaulT and TejunH. ![]() The main differences with respect to the previous proposal are:ġ. The proposed approach allows to constrain the minimum and maximum capacity Utilization, has been now replaced by a more simple yet effective set The previous boosting strategy, based on the inflation of the CPU's Task boosting/capping is now implemented as an extension on top ofĢ. Of a CPU depending on the set of tasks currently RUNNABLE on that CPU. The usage of the DL class, but still don't need to run at the maximum Android, ChromeOS, etc.) to efficiently implement differentĪ) Boosting of important tasks, by enforcing a minimum capacity in theĬPUs where they are enqueued for execution.ī) Capping of background tasks, by enforcing a maximum capacity.Ĭ) Containment of OPPs for RT tasks which cannot easily be switched to Tasks classification to frequencies selection, thus allowing informed This means that the new proposed approach allows to extend the concept of Used to clamp the CPU utilization when the schedutil CPUFreq's governor The set of active constraints are tracked by the core scheduler, thus theyĪpply across all the scheduling classes. Principles, such as the support for single hierarchy and the "limit" The new approach has also been designed to be compliant to CGroups v2 Merged capacity awareness bits, in order to achieve a more complete tasksīoosting/capping strategy which is completely scheduler driven and based on Resource distribution model (described in Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt).Ī further development of this idea is under development and will allow toĮxploit the same capacity capping attributes, in conjunction to the recently
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |